<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>USAF on</title><link>https://geekyschmidt.com/tags/usaf/</link><description>Recent content in USAF on</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright ©2002-2026, Nicholas Schmidt; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://geekyschmidt.com/tags/usaf/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Loyal Wingman: What the USAF Can Teach Senior Developers About AI</title><link>https://geekyschmidt.com/post/2026-07-31-loyalwingman/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://geekyschmidt.com/post/2026-07-31-loyalwingman/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The USAF&amp;rsquo;s Collaborative Combat Aircraft recent updates got me thinking about AI in software engineering. I spent my Air Force career securing information systems. Not flying them. But after decades in aviation, the Loyal Wingman concept hits different when you are building software.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grew up a military brat near air bases, hearing afterburners crack overhead. I joined the Air Force for information security, not the flight line. Closest I got to the cockpit was securing the systems behind it. Working in aviation most of my adult life makes the Loyal Wingman analogy for AI less of a stretch and more of lived experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>