<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Core on</title><link>https://geekyschmidt.com/tags/core/</link><description>Recent content in Core on</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.155.3</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright © 2002–2025, Nicholas Schmidt; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://geekyschmidt.com/tags/core/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Multi-core Security</title><link>https://geekyschmidt.com/2010/09/08/multi-core-security/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:04:47 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://geekyschmidt.com/2010/09/08/multi-core-security/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A question from a distinguished colleague of mine:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Q:&lt;/strong&gt; Some security group is claiming that locking apps down to a single cpu is more secure that multi-threaded apps.  Is there any basis in fact that I don’t know of or is this as ridiculous as I think it is? – Distinguished Dude&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;span style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;It is called Side Channel Attacks…thus far its only a theory that has no known in the wild exploit&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>