<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just say &#8220;NO&#8221; to OS Level Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekyschmidt.com/2008/07/12/just-say-no-to-os-level-virtualization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekyschmidt.com/2008/07/12/just-say-no-to-os-level-virtualization</link>
	<description>Binary makes me giggle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wills&#8217; Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spell checker?</title>
		<link>http://geekyschmidt.com/2008/07/12/just-say-no-to-os-level-virtualization/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wills&#8217; Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spell checker?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyschmidt.com/?p=569#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] OS Level virtualization isn&#8217;t necessarily horrible, but on Windows it&#8217;s suboptimal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OS Level virtualization isn&#8217;t necessarily horrible, but on Windows it&#8217;s suboptimal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Short Take #13 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://geekyschmidt.com/2008/07/12/just-say-no-to-os-level-virtualization/comment-page-1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Short Take #13 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekyschmidt.com/?p=569#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] This one was quite interesting to me. Question #2 is particularly applicable: why is a reboot required, anyway? (Yes, yes, I know&#8212;there is a workaround that does not require a reboot. It&#8217;s the principle of the matter.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This one was quite interesting to me. Question #2 is particularly applicable: why is a reboot required, anyway? (Yes, yes, I know&#8212;there is a workaround that does not require a reboot. It&#8217;s the principle of the matter.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

