This patch will ensure that Friendster and Obama are added to your dictionary on Vista and 2008 Server. No big deal right? This brings up a few questions for me:
- Why does my server have a GUI?
- Why does this patch require a reboot?
- Who is typing the words Friendster or Obama on their 2008 Server?
At the root of the issue is that I will never deploy Hyper-V for enviroments I admin. I understand patching for core issues and security but this is stupid. If this server was in fact running my virtual server farm I would now be rebooting for Friendster and Obama. Yikes!
2 Responses to Just say “NO” to OS Level Virtualization
Tag
android apologetic apple catholic christian dating debian encryption geek God google howto iphone life linux love mac military nokia Personal phone poetry politics pope relationship relationships religion religious review running security tech Techie technology theology travel tweets twitter ubuntu UNIX video vintage vmware work writing
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
- Nick Schmidt lives passionately in the digital world advising and advancing technology everywhere he goes. He has served in the US Air Force, been a self-employed consultant, a senior manager and chief engineer at Boeing, and now co-founding and running Spec Ops Technology. Decorated in his military and professional career you can find his work in the nations networks and across the web.





[...] This one was quite interesting to me. Question #2 is particularly applicable: why is a reboot required, anyway? (Yes, yes, I know—there is a workaround that does not require a reboot. It’s the principle of the matter.) [...]
[...] OS Level virtualization isn’t necessarily horrible, but on Windows it’s suboptimal. [...]